Retail Clinics Show Little Effect on Emergency Department Visit Volume

Written by: Jeff Lagasse, Associate Editor | Healthcare Finance

Retail clinics have been popping up all over the country, and some consumers are using them as convenient, low-cost alternatives to low-acuity care. But a new study published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine found that, overall, retail clinics don't seem to be making a dent in the usage of Emergency Departments.

ED visits continue to increase, driven in large part by patients with low-acuity conditions. These visits contribute to ED crowding, which has not only been linked to lower quality care, but is more costly from a health plan's perspective.

Since up to 13.7 percent of ED visits are for low-acuity conditions that in theory could be treated in retail clinics, it would seem probable that retail clinics would eat into that ED usage since they're open on weekends and in the evenings, appointments are unnecessary, wait times tend to be short, and they accept most types of private insurance, as well as Medicare. While there were only 130 of them in 2006, by 2012 there were 1,400 nationwide. One-third of the U.S. population lives within a 10-minute drive of a retail clinic.

However, study authors found that, among the areas studied, no link was found between ED visits and retail clinics, at least when factoring in all patients.

The only correlation was among patients with private insurance living near a retail clinic, who did utilize EDs slightly less -- although the dip was small, about 0.3 percent.

The findings were consistent with a recent study in Health Affairs that found a small reduction in the use of physician office or ED visits among patients using retail clinics, although that study also found that the majority of retail clinic visits represent new use, not substitution for other options. A key distinction, though, was that the Health Affairs findings did not focus specifically on ED visits, and focused only on patients with commercial insurance.

Continue Reading Article


Photo from: Wikipedia

All information contained in this publication is derived from sources that are deemed to be reliable. However, Newmark has not verified any such information, and the same constitutes the statements and representations only of the source thereof, and not of Newmark. Any recipient of this publication should independently verify such information and all other information that may be material to any decision that recipient may make in response to this publication, and should consult with professionals of the recipient's choice with regard to all aspects of that decision, including its legal, financial, and tax aspects and implications. Any recipient of this publication may not, without the prior written approval of Newmark, distribute, disseminate, publish, transmit, copy, broadcast, upload, download, or in any other way reproduce this publication or any of the information it contains. This document is intended for informational purposes only and none of the content is intended to advise or otherwise recommend a specific strategy. It is not to be relied upon in any way to predict market movement, investment in securities, transactions, investment strategies or any other matter.

Download Our

Sign Up for Our Newsletter